{"id":53,"date":"2015-11-26T03:55:00","date_gmt":"2015-11-26T03:55:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10060\/?p=53"},"modified":"2021-05-05T03:57:38","modified_gmt":"2021-05-05T03:57:38","slug":"revisiting-feminism-and-the-bibles-view-of-women","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/localhost:10060\/revisiting-feminism-and-the-bibles-view-of-women\/","title":{"rendered":"Revisiting Feminism and the Bible\u2019s View of Women"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
About a year ago, I got into a discussion with a Christian blogger about the term feminist. I told him that I didn\u2019t think any Christian should call themselves a feminist. I told him that another word was needed if any real impact in the area of equality was to be achieved in American evangelical circles. The word feminism, I said, has been sullied and was associated strongly, in most American evangelical minds, with angry, bra-burning women that hated men and were pro-abortion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
To the Christian blogger\u2019s credit, he outright disagreed with me. And, he was nice about it. This challenged me. I like challenges. And wouldn\u2019t you know, just after our online discussion, everywhere I turned, I saw articles and books on feminism. I even had two pro-life Christian friends tell me that they considered themselves feminists. I just couldn\u2019t ignore or dismiss feminism or feminists, as no thinking person should\u2014Christian or not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And so, I began to ask myself is it possible to be a feminist and a Christian? Of course. It depends on how you define feminist\u2026and Christian.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A basic definition of a feminist is someone who believes that men and women should be treated equally in all spheres. In politics, women should be able to vote, run for political office, and even occupy the most powerful seat in government. In cultural and social spheres, women should be able to get the same level of education as men, marry and divorce of their own free will, live independently, and be protected from the threat of domestic violence, rape and sexual harassment. Feminism advocates a woman\u2019s right to work, to earn equal pay for equal work, to own property, and to conduct business independent of male control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If I were to ask 100 American evangelicals if they thought that women should be denied any of the rights above, I doubt that any would say no. But, I doubt that more than 10% would be okay if I called them a feminist. While the movement for women\u2019s rights actually has a biblical basis, and its early leadership had an evangelical background, feminism is rejected by most evangelicals as political movement meant to advance women\u2019s rights beyond that of men. And for women that love their sons, their husbands, their fathers, their brothers, their nephews, and their male friends, modern feminism is perceived to be too anti-man.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I will resist the temptation to get into the social-psychology that might be involved in the feminist movement today and its leaders. But, let it be said that movements arise for a reason. Movements are established in order to oppose a real or perceived injustice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In 2013, Sarah Bessey published Jesus Feminist: An Invitation to Revisit the Bible\u2019s View of Women<\/a>. <\/em>The book is a popular appeal to evangelical women to reconsider traditional teachings on women\u2019s roles in the church. It contains a lot of stories from Bessey\u2019s own experiences as a woman in ministry and church leadership. Her use of the term \u201cfeminist\u201d in the title was more provocative than indicative of a substantive study of Jesus\u2019 view of women. Frankly, it left me wanting, and a bit irritated by the fireside chat tone. I don\u2019t like and don\u2019t need difficult questions of theology served up with a cup of tea and cookies. I like my theology direct, plain, and \u201clike a man,\u201d thank you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But, I\u2019m not a man. I\u2019m a woman. But, how should that difference or differences between the sexes affect our lives and our involvement in Christian circles, if indeed, we are believers in the inerrancy of the Bible? I\u2019m not totally sure, yet. But, I know that in my eight years of formal ministry that I have more questions now about traditional views of women in ministry than I did when I started. Biblical passages such as Acts 2:17 have taken on new depths of meaning for me. I have seen that God has, indeed, poured out His Spirit on all people. I have not only been in the presence of \u201csons of God\u201d when they have prophesied, but I have also heard \u201cdaughters of God\u201d utter words prompted by the Holy Spirit that have been prophetic. Spiritual gifts are not gender specific.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I have discovered that women matter profoundly to the advancement of the kingdom of God, and not just in the sphere of the home. I have discovered that God has gifted all of us to minister. Our lives are to be measured by more than a standard of femininity established by our culture. We might be a Martha, but we all have a right to be a Mary without limitations or shame.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Perhaps it is no wonder that the women were first at the Cradle and last at the Cross. They had never known a man like this Man\u2014there never has been such another. A prophet and teacher who never nagged at them, never flattered or coaxed or patronized; who never made arch jokes about hem, never retreated them either as \u201cThe women, God help us!\u201d or \u201cThe ladies, God bless them!\u201d; who rebuked without querulousness and praised without condescension; who took their questions and arguments seriously; who never mapped out their sphere for them, never urged them to be feminine or jeered at them for being female; who had no axe to grind and no uneasy male dignity to defend; who took them as he found them and was completely unselfconscious. There is not act, no sermon, no parable in that whole Gospel that borrows it pungency from female perversity; nobody could possible guess from the words and deeds of Jesus that there was anything \u201cfunny\u201d about woman\u2019s nature.<\/p> \u2014 Dorothy Sayers, Are Women Human?<\/a><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Last year, when I first determined to better understand my calling, my faith tradition, my culture, and whether or not Jesus was a feminist, I amassed a short reading list from different sides of the Biblical feminism debate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Here is what I started with:<\/p>\n\n\n\nComplementarian or Egalitarian<\/h4>\n\n\n\n